Legal Opinion

In re Rourke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 10, 1910PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by Lillian Y. Bourke from part of an order of the Supreme Court,. made at the Kings County Special Term and entered'in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 19th day of July, 1909, modifying the report of a referee upon the determination of the title to certain awards for, parts of' damage parcel No. 61 • to “ unknown owners ” in proceedings for the opening of Montgomery street in the former city of Brooklyn.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J. :

The report of - the referee in this proceeding awarded to the appellant the sum of $1,352.03 as her portion of an award of $3,180 made to damage parcel No. 61 tó “ unknown owners.” This report has been modified by the order' here under review, giving to the claimant Malone the sum of $682.61, which sum is to be deducted from the amount found to be due to the claimant Bourke, who brings this appeal.

It seems that Bernard J. Malone was the original owner of the fee of a portion of the premises involved in this controversy, and he claims an interest in the award upon the ground that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. . LadewNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Larned v. . HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Wissel v. OttAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Craig v. Commissioners of the Sinking FundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  2. Bodinger v. GarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. Maffetone v. MicariCity of New York Municipal Court · 1954
  4. Barnes v. KandtNew York Supreme Court · 1911
  5. City of New York v. NunezNew York Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API