Larned v. . Hudson
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
To sustain this judgment it must be established that neither upon the plaintiff's version of the arrangement nor upon that testified to by the defendant, did the defendant become a tenant at will or by sufferance. If the arrangement, as testified to by the defendant, created such a tenancy the court erred in not submitting the case to the jury as requested. Independently of the question, whether or not the plaintiff's evidence established such a tenancy, we are clearly of opinion that if the defendant's is the true version of the transaction he became a tenant at will. When one enters upon…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jackson v. BradtNew York Supreme Court · 1804
- Post v. PostNew York Supreme Court · 1852
- Burns v. . BryantNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lamme v. DodsonMontana Supreme Court · 1883
- Thompson v. BaxterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Davis v. DinkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Statement, Inc. v. Pilgrim's Landing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Pfalzgraf v. VosoNew York Supreme Court · 1945
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.