Innovative Home Health Care, Inc. v. P.T.-O.T. Associates of the Black Hills
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KOPF, District Judge.
Karl Kirsch and Susan Redden, defendants in the proceedings below, appeal from the district court’s 2 amended judgment granting summary judgment in their favor on all of the plaintiffs’ claims, but dismissing without prejudice the defendants’ counterclaims for indemnification. Kirsch and Redden argue the district court erred in dismissing their indemnification counterclaims by declining to retain supplemental jurisdiction over the counterclaims in response to the plaintiffs’ “motion for rehearing or relief from judgment” when the district court had previously entered…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lashawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- William F. Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corporation, and David C. TjosvoldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Walter C. Hudson, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Stupka v. Great Lakes Ed. (In Re Stupka)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
- Ethex Corp. v. First Horizon Pharmaceutical Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2002
- Knish v. StineDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2004
- Innovative Home Health Care, Inc. v. P.T.-O.T. Associates Of The Black HillsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.