Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1945No. Appeal, 201PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mu. Justice Pattebson,

Richard Wagner, appellant, instituted this proceeding in mandamus against the City of Pittsburgh and officials of the said city, to compel his reinstatement as a building inspector, alleging that his discharge was in violation of the civil service laws and regulations of said city. After preliminary proceedings, which are immaterial here, the case was tried before a jury which returned a verdict for appellant. This appeal is from the decree of the court en banc entering judgment non obstante veredicto for appellees.

Wagner was appointed building inspector by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Souder v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Raffel v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Gretton v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kaufman Construction Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Zeber AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Crede v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Whisted v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Sadowski v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API