Legal Opinion

Dengler v. Hazel Blessinger Family Trust

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2005No. 30247PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIDWELL, Justice Pro Tem.

This is an action seeking damages for breach of a contract for the sale of land. As part of the sale, the seller was to obtain and convey an easement for access to the landlocked parcel of property. The district court concluded this term was a condition precedent to the seller’s obligation to convey the property and failure of the condition excused the seller’s performance; therefore, the seller did not breach the contract. We affirm.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Hazel Blessinger Family Trust (the Trust) was the owner of real property located in the Boise…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Miles v. Idaho Power Co. Ex Rel. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Opportunity, L.L.C. v. OssewardeIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. IRON EAGLE DEVELOPMENT, LLC. v. Quality Design Systems, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Samuel v. Hepworth, Nungester & Lezamiz, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Frontier Development Group, LLC v. CaravellaIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  2. University of Idaho Foundation, Inc. v. Civic Partners, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In Re University Place/Idaho Water Center ProjectIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Choice Feed Inc. v. MontierthIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Davis v. Key Gas Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API