Legal Opinion

Lamalfa v. Hearn

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 28, 2017No. 0087/16PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeborah S. Eyler, J.

In the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Patricia Lamalfa, the appellant, sued Janis Hearn, the appellee, for automobile negligence. The case was tried to a jury over two days. During the testimony of Ms. Hearn’s medical expert, the court admitted into evidence, over objection, four of Ms. Lamalfa’s post-accident medical treatment records that the expert relied upon in forming his opinions. At the close of all the evidence, the court granted a motion for judgment in favor Ms. Lamalfa on “negligence” and ruled that the case would go to the jury “for its determination as to the amount of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Gypsum Co. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. NothsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Brown v. Daniel Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Alban v. FielsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Gillespie v. GillespieCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lamalfa v. HearnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. Lamalfa v. HearnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API