Legal Opinion

Farwell v. Wilcox

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 22, 1918No. 9131PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Dewey County; Frank Mathews, Assigned Judge. Suit by Paul R. Wilcox against Grant D. Farwell. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

Wilcox sued Farwell to recover damages alleged to have been caused to him by Farwell ousting him by force and fear from a partnership which he contends they had made and operated in Dewey county from August, 1915, to April, 1916.

Wilcox contends that .one M. owned certain property in the city of Seiling and also a Ford agency which he wanted to sell for the sum of $3,000, and that he wanted to buy it, but did not have the money, so he (Wilcox) interested Farwell in the deal, and Farwell refused to pay over $2,500 for same, and in order to consummate the transaction he paid…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Karrick v. HannamanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Taylor v. . BradleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  4. Bagley v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  5. McCoy v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pemberton v. Ladue Realty & Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Johnson v. StewardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  3. Fitts v. Mission Health & Beauty ShopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Reed v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Delay v. FosterIdaho Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API