Legal Opinion
MR. J. v. Board of Educ.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 29, 2000No. 3:98CV1502(RNC), 3:98CV1531(RNC)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHATIGNY, District Judge.
After review and absent objection, the recommended ruling is hereby approved and adopted.
RECOMMENDED RULING ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MARTINEZ, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before this court are cross motions for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the undersigned recommends that the plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. # 43) be GRANTED in part, DENIED in part and the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. #40) be GRANTED in part, DENIED in part.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This is a consolidated action comprised of two cases…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- BD v. DeBuonoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Goldring Ex Rel. Anderson v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Pearl Murphy, Theodore Murphy v. Arlington Central School District Board of Education, No. 03-7850-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- P.G. v. Brick Township Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- A.S. v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.