A.S. v. Board of Education
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and hereby is AFFIRMED.
Plaintiff-appellant A.S., by his parent and next friend P.B.S., timely appeals from the Ruling entered August 20, 2001,1 that granted the motion of defendant-appellee Board of Education for the Town of West Hartford (“the Board”) for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 because the Board provided A.S. with a “free and appropriate public education” as required under 20 U.S.C. § 1412(a)(1)(A) of the Individuals with Disabilities…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Robert Walczak and Karen Walczak v. Florida Union Free School District and Maureen FlahertyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- M.C., by & Through His Parent & Next Friend Mrs. C v. Voluntown Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- MR. J. v. Board of Educ.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
3Cited by8 opinions
- Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. East Lyme Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Doe v. E. Lyme Bd. of Educ.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Navarro Carrilo v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Collado v. New York City Department Of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Doe v. E. Lyme Bd. of Educ.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.