Legal Opinion

Heade v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 12, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2009-2460Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) MYRTLE HEADE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-02460 (ESH) ) WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA ) TRANSIT AUTHORITY. ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Myrtle Heade has sued defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) for violation of Maryland Code § 9-1105, which prohibits an employer from discharging an employee solely because the employee files a worker’s compensation claim.

Md. Code Ann., Lab. & Empl. §…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  2. Adler v. American Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Weinberger v. TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  4. Ewing v. Koppers Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Kern v. South Baltimore General HospitalCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API