Legal Opinion
People v. Ranger Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 19, 2000No. B126008PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAU,J.*
Defendant and appellant Ranger Insurance Company (hereinafter Ranger) appeals from a summary judgment on bail bond forfeiture entered in favor of plaintiff and respondent County of Los Angeles (hereinafter County). Ranger contends the statutory period during which the trial court could enter summary judgment had expired, and the court acted in excess of its jurisdiction.
The Penal Code requires a court to declare the undertaking of bail forfeited if a defendant fails to appear (§ 1305, subd. (a)).1 If the undertaking is over a specified amount, the clerk must mail notice of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- County of Los Angeles v. Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. American Contractors Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Granite State InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. Seneca InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. Int'l Fid. Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. International Fidelity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.