Legal Opinion · Dissent

Deanda v. AIU Insurance

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 20, 2004No. 98,986Published

1Dissent

KAUGER, J.,

with whom WATT, C.J., HODGES and EDMONDSON, J.J. join, dissenting:

T 1 The majority's failure to honor without overruling jurisprudence clearly signaling to the Legislature and employees that injured workers may reasonably expect fair dealing and putting workers' compensation insurers on notice that acting in bad faith may subject the insurer to tort damages is disingenuous. One can only assume that the majority's "general observation" concerning the status of this Court's jurisprudence as "obiter dictum" is itself in the category of language failing to constitute "a judicial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Toxic Waste Impact Group, Inc. v. LeavittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Rivas v. Parkland ManorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. City of Hugo v. State Ex Rel. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. Comer v. Preferred Risk Mutual Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  5. Stevens v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API