George T. Ross Lodge No. 831 Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, Justice.
Action for an injunction in which defendants prevailed. Plaintiffs appeal from the order denying them a new trial.
The pleadings are lengthy; so are the findings (covering 40 pages of the record) ; and the evidence, including documentary exhibits, is voluminous. Therefore a much condensed statement of the controversy must suffice. There ívere innumerable exceptions to the rulings on evidence; but neither in the motion for a new trial nor on this appeal is error assigned on such rulings save in one particular, which will be hereinafter noted. So it may be said that the appeal is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Piercy v. Louisville & Nashville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Shaup v. Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Aulich v. CraigmyleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Crisler v. CrumNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
- George v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
3Cited by15 opinions
- Division 525, Order of Ry. Conductors of America v. GormanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Walker v. Pennsylvania-Reading S.S. LinesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
- Earle v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942
- Evans v. JohnstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
- Mueller v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.