In re Steed
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
In Bankruptcy. Petition for discharge, and objections thereto.
1Opinion of the Court
PURNELL, District Judge.
Steed & Curtis were, on their own petition, adjudged bankrupt January 18, 1901. Six reasons are assigned why the discharge should not be granted:
1. That the bankrupts at various times not long prior to the filing of the petition made or published false and fraudulent statements of their financial condition, with intent to conceal their financial condition, etc. The referee does not find the facts, or state his cone he sions of law, as should have been done. This should be done in every case sent up for review. A referee, who has seen the witnesses, and heard their…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- MacKin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Forsyth v. VehmeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- In re RhutasselDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ethridge v. PittsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- In re HamiltonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1904
- In re WollockDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1903
- In re WhiteDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1915
- In re J. M. Monroe & Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1907