Legal Opinion
Wultz v. Bank of China Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 25, 2013No. 11 Civ. 1266(SAS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
1. INTRODUCTION
This suit arises out of the death of Daniel Wultz and the injuries of Yekutiel Wultz, suffered in a 2006 suicide bombing in Tel Aviv, Israel. Four members of the Wultz family brought suit against Bank of China (“BOC”), alleging acts of international terrorism under the Antiterrorism Act (“ATA”),1 among other claims.
All of plaintiffs’ non-federal claims against BOC have been dismissed.2 In *484addition, plaintiffs’ attempt to hold BOC liable for aiding, and abetting international terrorism under the ATA has been categorically…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wultz v. Bank of China Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Krys v. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton, & Garrison LLP (In re China Medical Technologies, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- United States Ex Rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Leonard v. John Hancock Life Insurance Company of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.