Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 11, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2005-1276PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Resolving Does. 151 & 152]
OPINION & ORDER
JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:
In its March 6, 2014 Opinion and Order, the Court granted Plaintiff-Relator Bar-ko’s motion to compel the production of 89 documents. The KBR Defendants had withheld the documents on the basis of attorney-client privilege or attorney work-product protection grounds. 1 In ordering the production, the Court found that these documents were ordinary business records and were created to satisfy United States defense contractor requirements. The Court found the documents were not created to obtain or receive legal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re: Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Blumenthal v. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Federal Trade Commission v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Scott v. City of Sioux CityDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2015
- Blumenthal v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.