Legal Opinion

Bissell v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 8, 1996No. 93 Civ. 8243 (AGS)PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHWARTZ, District Judge:

This matter is before the Court upon the motion of defendants Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (collectively, “MLPF & S”) to dismiss all claims alleged in the Second Amended Class Action Complaint (the “Complaint”) under Rules 12(b)(6) and 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the motion of plaintiff Louis G. Bissell, Jr. (“Bissell” or “plaintiff”) for class certification. For the reasons set forth below, MLPF & S’s motion is granted, and Bissell’s motion is denied as moot.

BACKGROUND 1

In this…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Fesseha v. TD Waterhouse Investor Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Kirschner v. BennettDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  3. Vasile v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
  4. Independent Order of Foresters v. Donald, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. Granite Partners, L.P. v. Bear, Stearns & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API