Hogan Ex Rel. Hogan v. Johnson Motor Lines
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
By this appeal the appellants challenge as unconstitutional the provision in G.S. 97-10.2(f)(2) which directs that the attorney fee incurred by the party who effects recovery against a third party tort-feasor be apportioned between and paid by the employee and employer in proportion to the amount which each receives from the recovery. We find the statute constitutional and affirm the order of the Industrial Commission.
As originally enacted, the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act required an employee injured by the tort of a third party to elect between accepting an award…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Reno v. Maryland Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hardy v. Brantley Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Radzisz v. Harley Davidson of Metrolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Davis v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989