Legal Opinion

Hogan Ex Rel. Hogan v. Johnson Motor Lines

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 17, 1978No. 7810IC451PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

By this appeal the appellants challenge as unconstitutional the provision in G.S. 97-10.2(f)(2) which directs that the attorney fee incurred by the party who effects recovery against a third party tort-feasor be apportioned between and paid by the employee and employer in proportion to the amount which each receives from the recovery. We find the statute constitutional and affirm the order of the Industrial Commission.

As originally enacted, the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act required an employee injured by the tort of a third party to elect between accepting an award…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reno v. Maryland Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hardy v. Brantley Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Radzisz v. Harley Davidson of Metrolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Davis v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API