Legal Opinion

Reno v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1962No. 37228PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice House

Plaintiffs instituted this action to recover an attorney’s fee from their client’s employer under section 5(b) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. (111. Rev. Stat. 1959, chap. 48, par. 138.5(b).) They represented Frank Eklund, an employee of defendant Simon J. Carlson & Son, Inc., in his claim for damages against a negligent third party. A settlement was negotiated with the third party’s insurer whereby Eklund was paid $88,902.11 and his employer’s insurer was to be reimbursed for the $8,597.89 it had paid Eklund under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Plaintiffs filed an attorney’s lien for 25%…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grasse v. Dealer's Transport Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Geneva Construction Co. v. Martin Transfer & Storage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Baker & Conrad, Inc. v. Chicago Heights Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. LaFever v. Kemlite Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re Estate of DierkesIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re Estate of CallahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Eastman v. MessnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Ramsey v. MorrisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1997

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API