Legal Opinion

Virgilio v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1992No. 90-209PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

Vernon Virgilio appeals his convictions for aiding and abetting the delivery of a controlled substance and conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance.

We affirm.

Virgilio brings the following issues:

ISSUE I

Whether the appellant was convicted contrary to law where the prosecutor presented an improper basis of criminal liability and the court’s instructions were ambiguous and could have been interpreted by the jury to mean that mere knowledge of the criminal act was sufficient for a conviction?

ISSUE II

Whether the appellant was improperly denied instructions on his theory of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hopkinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Grabill v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. SpearsWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Mayer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  5. United States v. Alejandro Rubio-EstradaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Gleason v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Wehr v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Dean v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Howard v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API