Legal Opinion

Langford v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1987No. L.A. 32105PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

We granted review in this case to determine whether the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) should be enjoined from using a motorized battering ram and pyrotechnic explosive devices known as “flash-bangs” to execute searches of so-called “rock houses,” which are specially fortified residential dwellings where crystallized “rock” cocaine is made and sold. As will appear, we are persuaded that the unregulated use of the motorized battering ram, but not the flashbangs, poses a significant and unusual threat to property and public safety that may, unless subject to judicial…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Dalia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. FudgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. King v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Garcia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Cox Cable San Diego, Inc. v. BookspanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API