Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1992No. 1991-1748PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Per curiam

Resolution of the instant appeal centers exclusively on the proper application of the harmless error doctrine. As stated by the United States Supreme Court in Chapman v. California (1967), 386 U.S. 18, 22, 87 S.Ct. 824, 827, 17 L.Ed.2d 705, 709: “[T]here may be some constitutional errors which in the setting of a particular case are so unimportant and insignificant that they may, consistent with the Federal Constitution, be deemed harmless, not requiring the automatic reversal of the conviction.”

The court of appeals, in reversing appellee’s conviction, focused on the search of appellee’s van.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Florida v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. State v. LytleOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. United States v. MorianiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. State v. GapenOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. PlottOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State v. MaysOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. MesserOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. State v. BrentlingerOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API