Legal Opinion
United States v. Forma
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 26, 1992No. 88 Civ. 6458 (RWS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The United States of America (the “Government”) has moved to vacate the prior judgment and order against it pursuant to Rule 55 or Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and for an order dismissing the counterclaim brought against it by John and Patricia Forma (the “Formas”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3). In the alternative, the Government seeks to vacate the prior judgment and order against it for further proceedings or for a hearing pursuant to Rule 55(e).
For the reasons set forth below, the Government’s motion to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. John & Patricia FormaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- International Paper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Slovacek v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Salomon v. 1498 Third Realty Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- United States v. Anthony JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.