Legal Opinion
Slovacek v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 6, 1998No. 94-457TPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*829 Opinion and Order
WEINSTEIN, Judge.
On November 26, 1997, plaintiffs filed a motion to compel consistent treatment (“Motion”) seeking (1) to require defendant to settle this case on the same terms offered to other partners of Nupath Development III (“Nupath”) by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) tax division office in Dallas or, alternatively, (2) leave to amend their complaint to add a new cause of action based on defendant’s abuse of discretion for DOJ’s refusal to so settle.
Defendant’s response to plaintiffs’ Motion was filed on February 27, 1998.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Amanda Beck, a Minor, by Her Father, Henry J. Beck v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Allan J. Jablonski v. Pan American World Airways, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Gerald Alan Brown, and Charles v. Darnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- City of Chicago v. Environmental Defense FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Milas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Keener v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Greenberg Bros. P'ship 4 v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1998
- Shoshone Indian Tribe of the Wind River Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- McGann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.