State Highway Department v. Howard
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pannell, Judge.
1. Where a limited access highway is condemned by the State, which highway cuts off 19 acres from the remainder of the land of the condemnee leaving said 19 acres without any access thereto, testimony offered by the condemnor that with access there would be no damage to the 19 acres, standing alone, is inadmissible and without probative value on the question of consequential damages to the 19 acres without access. While, coupled with evidence of the cost of acquiring access, it may have been admissible for the purpose of showing that the consequential damages were the cost of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Calhoun v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- State Highway Department v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- State Highway Department v. LumpkinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Klumok v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- State Highway Department v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Herrin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- City of Atlanta v. McLucasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Department of Transportation v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Department of Transportation v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.