Worsham v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
The bill seeks the cancellation of a deed executed by complainant to defendants, who were her sons, conveying certain real estate therein described, and from a decree of cancellation defendants prosecute this appeal.
We think the bill is properly to be interpreted as one seeking relief on the ground of undue influence, and sufficient for that purpose as against any assignments of demurrer interposed thereto. Pilcher v. Surles, 202 Ala. 643, 81 So. 585; Alexander v. Gibson, 176 Ala. 258, 57 So. 760.
The relationship of parent and child is confidential (McLeod v. McLeod, 145 Ala.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Waddell v. LanierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- McLeod v. McLeodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Mullen v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Alexander v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Sumners v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Floyd v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Webb v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Jones v. BootheSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Tipton v. TiptonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Dillard v. HovaterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.