Legal Opinion

Quick v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 13, 2008No. A08-307PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

In this appeal, Jon Earl Quick challenges the posteonviction court’s denial of his second petition for posteonviction relief. In the petition, Quick claims that: (1) he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel; (2) this court erred on direct appeal by using the wrong standard to affirm the exclusion of three defense witnesses; (3) he was incompetent to stand trial; (4) new evidence that the crime scene team leader was recently convicted of a controlled substance crime requires an eviden- tiary hearing; and (5) he should be resen-tenced pursuant to Minn.Stat. §…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Black v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. State v. QuickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. Wieland v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  2. Chaun Dubae Carridine v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  3. Laine v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. State of Minnesota v. Vidale Lee Whitson, Vidale Lee Whitson v. State of Minnesota, C5-02-2108Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  5. Tracy Alan Zornes v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API