State v. Smith
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendant first argues that the charges against her should have been dismissed because there was a fatal variance between the allegation of ownership of the property in the arrest warrant and the proof of ownership at trial. This argument is without merit. The warrant in this case charged defendant with stealing the property of “K-Mart Stores, Inc., Lenoir, N. C.” Peggy Hammond, an employee of the store, testified that the name of the store is “K-Mart, Inc.” or “K-Mart Corporation.” Defendant’s witness H. F. Kirk, manager of the Lenoir K-Mart, testified that the correct…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. NugentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. TomblinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. McKoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.