Legal Opinion

Reimers-Hild v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 2007No. S-06-203PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.

The coverage required by Nebraska’s Uninsured and Underinsured Motorist Insurance Coverage Act 1 does not apply to “[b]odily injury, sickness, disease, or death of the insured with respect to which the applicable statute of limitations has expired on the insured’s claim against the uninsured or underinsured motorist.” 2 The question presented in this case is whether a statute of limitations can be said to “expire” if the insured settles his or her claim against the alleged tort-feasor within the statutory limitations period, but does not file a complaint against the tort-feasor within the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hamm v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. Betterman v. Dept. of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Waynesville Security Bank v. Stuyvesant Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Northwall v. State, Dept. of RevenueNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. MacKey v. Bristol West Insurance Service of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Davis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Davenport Ltd. v. 75th & Dodge INebraska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Good Samaritan Coffee v. LaRue DistributingNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Amend v. Nebraska Pub. Serv. Comm.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API