Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Petuskey v. Cannon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 21, 1987No. 68671Published

1ConcurrenceOpala, Justice

Although I concur generally in the court’s pronouncement, I offer my own analysis in the hope of providing some easy-to-follow guidelines for a more harmonious interaction of the court clerk with the presiding judge of the judicial administrative district — the two constitutional officers 1 now locked in combat for the control of certain management functions in the operations of the district court.

The presiding judge has “general administrative authority” over the judicial administrative district.2 The personnel who stand subordinate to this authority, which is subject to the Supreme Court’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sterling Refining Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Hirsh v. TwyfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Earl v. Tulsa County District CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Matney v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Little v. County Exclse Board of Marshall CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API