In Re Estate of Dreyfus
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Neighbours, Hoag & Burke, and M. J. Platshek, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Philip Herbold filed a petition for the admission to probate of a document, as the last will of the decedent, Gustav Dreyfus. The petition alleges that this paper was not attested by any witness, that it was wholly in typewriting, except the signature of the decedent thereto, that said signature was written by the decedent with pen and ink, and that the remainder of the document, including the proper date, was written by the decedent himself by the manipulation of a typewriting machine. The evidence was to the same effect. Thereupon the court, below made its order refusing to admit the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Harrington v. SteesIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Gould v. Safford's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1866
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thorn v. California Academy of SciencesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Irving v. Scripps Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Estate of BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Wolf v. GallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Estate of GoldsworthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.