In Re Unitec Elevator Services Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TERRY JENNINGS, Justice.
By petition for writ of mandamus, rela-tors, Unitec Elevator Services Company d/b/a VTM Elevator Company, VTM Elevator Company, NAES Central, Inc., NAES Central, Inc., formerly known as Unitec Elevator Services, and NAES Central, Inc., d/b/a VTM Elevator Company, challenge the trial court’s orders of April 5, 2004 and December 20, 2004, denying relators’ motions for leave to designate responsible third parties in the underlying lawsuit. 1 See Tex. Crv. PRAC. & Rem.Code Ann. § 33.004 (Vernon Supp.2004-2005). In their sole issue, relators contend that the trial…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re CanalesTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Cities of Austin v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re Arthur Andersen LLP, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Ingrid Fisher v. HalliburtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Cheryl Harris v. Kellogg Brown & Root ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- In re CVR Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- In Re Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2012
- Flack v. Hanke, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.