Legal Opinion

Continental Fibre Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 6, 1923No. 3697PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Infringement suit upon the Wright patent, No; 1,303,753, dated May 13, 1919, for a composite board, mainly useful for insulation in electric installations of high voltage. The District' Court held the patent invalid. The nature of the patent and the character of the questions involved satisfactorily appear from Judge Peck’s *456opinion, which we append hereto (substituting claim 2 for claim 1).

The issue is sharply presented by the action of the Patent Office, in which the examiner held that Wright had made an improvement over the Bakelite patent only in degree, while the Board of Examiners in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Burt v. EvorySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Florsheim v. SchillingSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Hicks v. KelseySupreme Court of the United States · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Western Willite Co. v. Trinidad Asphalt Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  2. Kalich v. Paterson Pacific Parchment Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  3. Application of HeritageCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  4. Aero Neck-Band & Collar Co. v. Beaver Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API