Legal Opinion
Anderson Union High School District v. Schreder
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 23, 1976No. Civ. 15474PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRIEDMAN, J.
The federal government distributes to the states a portion of federal forest reserve revenues; these are to be spent for public roads and schools as prescribed by state law. (16 U.S.C. § 500; King County v. Seattle School District No. (1923) 263 U.S. 361 [68 L.Ed. 339, 44 S.Ct. 127].) California law directs distribution of forest reserve receipts among the counties in proportion to their respective shares of the total forest reserves within the state; the counties are to spend half the money for roads, half the money for schools. (Gov. Code, §§ 29481, 29484.) This lawsuit,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People Ex Rel. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commission v. Town of EmeryvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. RusselCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- King County v. Seattle School Dist. No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Eminence R-1 School District v. HodgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Lewis v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- San Dieguito Partnership v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Board of County Commissioners v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Bakersfield Community Hospital v. Department of HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.