Frank Fitzgerald, Inc. v. PACELLA BROTHERS, INC
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtHale, C.J.
This action of contract was tried before an auditor under the usual order of reference and, by stipulation of the parties, his findings of fact were to be final. The auditor filed a report to which the defendant filed a number of objections. The defendant’s motion to recommit was allowed, and the auditor was directed to make additional subsidiary findings in support of a general finding to which the defendant had objected. In compliance with this order, the auditor made and reported additional subsidiary findings. Thereafter, on the motion of the plaintiff, a judge of the Superior Court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kurtigian v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Aerostatic Engineering Corp. v. SzczawinskiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
- Albre Marble & Tile Co. Inc. v. John Bowen Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Neilson v. Malcolm Kenneth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- HAYECK BUILDING & REALTY CO. INC. v. TurcotteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- J. A. Sullivan Corp. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- German v. FordCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
- Tomsic v. Pitocchelli (In Re Tri-Star Technologies Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Winchester Gables, Inc. v. Host Marriott Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- PDM Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Suffolk Construction Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.