Legal Opinion

Neilson v. Malcolm Kenneth Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 30, 1939PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

No error of law appears on this record in the denial by the Appellate Division of the plaintiff’s “application to vacate” the defendant’s appeal to this court from the order of the Appellate Division dismissing the report requested by the defendant. See G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231, § 108, third paragraph. What evidence was introduced at the hearing on this "application” does not appear. The plaintiff now contends that the defendant failed to comply with the requirement of G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231, § 135, that it should pay to the clerk the estimated expense of the preparation of the papers "within…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. Morey & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Kolda v. National-Ben Franklin Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Murphy v. Barry, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Stoneman v. Fox Film Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Buchannan v. MeisnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Massachusetts Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Haufler v. ZotosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  3. Kansallis Finance Ltd. v. FernMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. Rubel v. Hayden, Harding & Buchanan, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. Stanley A. Rodowicz v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, Stanley A. Rodowicz v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API