Legal Opinion

Aerostatic Engineering Corp. v. Szczawinski

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 2, 1973PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

The plaintiff, pursuant to a written agreement with the defendant, performed a substantial part of a $60,000 contract before terminating it because of the defendant’s asserted refusal to make payments as they became due under the contract. The plaintiff seeks in one count to recover $54,000 allegedly due under the contract and in a separate count to recover the same amount on an account annexed for labor and material furnished to the defendant. The plaintiff filed a motion for judgment on undisputed facts under G. L. c. 231, § 59, as amended through St. 1965, c. 491, § 1, which makes summary…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bucholz v. Green Bros. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  2. McMahon v. M & D BUILDERS, INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  3. Schuster v. BaskinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  4. Dalton v. American Ammonia Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  5. Petrangelo v. PollardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Buster v. George W. Moore, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. Prozinski v. Northeast Real Estate Services, LLCMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  3. Lease-It, Inc. v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  4. Ward v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. Teragram Corporation v. MarketWatch.com,Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API