Legal Opinion
Hassinger v. Seeley
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 3, 2006No. A04-2477PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s order denying his motion for a declaration that Minn.Stat. § 257.75 (2004) and Minn. Stat. § 257.541 (2004) are unconstitutional and that joint physical custody is preferred and the order awarding respondent sole physical custody of the parties’ son. Because we see no error of law in the denial of appellant’s motion and no abuse of discretion in the custody award, we affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Paul Hassinger and respondent Kerry Seeley lived together in a relationship for about ten months. They separated in May 2003. In…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Tuan Anh Nguyen v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Melina v. ChaplinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Tereault v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- John Stiles v. Roy D. Blunt, William L. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011