Legal Opinion

Mandel v. HIGHWAY AND LOCAL MOTOR FREIGHT DRIVERS, ETC.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 14, 1964PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, District Judge.

The union moves pursuant to Rule 12 F.R.Civ.P. to dismiss the first cause of action.

Yale Transport Corp. and Yale Express System, Inc. (hereinafter Management) move pursuant to Rule 12 F.R.Civ.P. to dismiss the second, third and fourth causes of action.

This memorandum undertakes to dispose of both motions.

UNION’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiffs aver that they now have, and for several years have had, substantial claims and grievances against management arising out of the collective bargaining agreement; that despite its repeated demands over a period of six years, the union…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Dioguardi v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  5. Syres v. Oil Workers International Union, Local No. 23Supreme Court of the United States · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sacks v. American Fletcher National Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Leo Desrosiers v. American Cyanamid Company, and International Chemical Workers Union a.f.l.-c.i.o. Local No. 436Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. Local 4076, United Steelworkers of America v. United Steelworkers of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Fiore v. Associated Transport, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Turley v. Hall's Motor Transit CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API