Legal Opinion

O'Keefe v. Passaic Valley Water Commission

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 27, 1993PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

POLLOCK, J.

This appeal presents a challenge by respondent, William M. O’Keefe, to the drug-testing program of appellant, Passaic Valley Water Commission (PVWC). PVWC has a written policy that all applicants for employment must submit to a drug test and that it may refuse to hire any applicant who tests positive. O’Keefe asserts that PVWC refused to hire him as a water-meter reader because he would not take the test. He contends that the program is unconstitutional under both the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and article one,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. George Harms Construction Co. v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  2. State v. BranchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  3. United States v. ScurrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  4. Randolph Town Center, L.P. v. County of MorrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  5. Rawlings v. Police Dept. of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API