Legal Opinion

Rawlings v. Police Dept. of Jersey City

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 13, 1993PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

POLLOCK, J.

This ease presents the issue whether defendant, Police Department of Jersey City (the department), violated the rights of plaintiff, Willie H. Rawlings, a police officer, under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution by directing him to submit a urine sample for mandatory drug testing. The department directed him to provide the sample pursuant to a departmental order that required officers to submit to testing on individualized reasonable suspicion that the officer unlawfully had used drugs. Plaintiff refused to…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In Re CarterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  2. State v. TuckerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  3. In Re CarrollNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  4. Martin O'boyle v. Borough of LongportSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  5. Hart v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API