Legal Opinion

Garlitz v. Rozar

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 24, 1972No. 1 CA-CIV 2040PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAIRE, Chief Judge,

Division 1.

In this special action proceeding, petitioner Jerry Edward Garlitz contends that the respondent judge lacks jurisdiction to consider a petition for modification of the child support provisions of a previously domesticized foreign divorce decree.

The respondent real party in interest, Betty White Garlitz, filed the modification petition in the Maricopa County Superior Court, after having previously domesticized a California decree in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act, A.R.S. § 12-1701 et seq. For the purposes of this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Lopez v. AverySupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  5. Pegler v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mitchim v. MitchimTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Stephens v. StephensSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  3. Storer v. StorerSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  4. Danis v. Ziff-Davis Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. Carlin v. CarlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API