In Re Notz
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
In the Curry ease, supra, it was stated (ante, at p. 210) : “Under the rules of these eases it is now settled that where there is a request to appeal within the 10-day period by the defendant, and a promise of the attorney to do so, or where there is such a promise but no such request, or where there is such a request but no promise, absent grounds of waiver or estoppel, the defendant is entitled to relief. ’ ’
In the instant case there was both a request and a promise.
Petitioner was convicted of receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496), a felony, in the Superior Court of the County of Los…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. DiehlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. AcostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. CamarilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. MadridCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. KrebsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.