Legal Opinion

People v. Krebs

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1965No. Crim. 8274PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Defendant seeks relief from his default in failing to file his notice of appeal in a criminal case within the 10-day limit specified by rule 31(a) of the California Rules of Court. That rule provides for relief from default in a proper case. In determining whether such relief should be granted it is now settled law that the rule should be liberally construed to protect the right of appeal where reasonably possible, and to that end doubts should be resolved in favor of the defendant. (See review of eases in People v. Curry, ante, p. 207 [42 Cal.Rptr. 17, 397 P.2d 1009]; see also In re Notz,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. In Re NotzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Goldendale v. GravesWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. MadridCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. HalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. People v. HalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. People v. WintersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API