Legal Opinion

United States v. John A. Conkey Co.

United States Customs Court

Decided April 24, 1941No. 5235; Entry No. 3515, etcPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Keefe, Judge:

These appeals for review involve five reappraise-ments covering importations of strike-on-box matches imported from Finland and Latvia and entered at Boston under the provisions of the Tariff Act of 1922. The appraiser advanced the value and made a finding of dumping duty in conformity with T. D. 44716 and T. D. 44719. The validity of the appraisements was attacked in the court below upon the grounds that the collector failed to designate and the appraiser failed to examine sufficient packages as required by section 499 of the Tariff Act of 1922.

The trial court held that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Tampa Box Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Peabody v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  3. United States v. Mills & GibbCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API