New York Merchandise Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Ekwall, Judge:
These protests which arose at the port -of Los Angeles, Calif., allege as follows:
Your liquidation is invalid because based upon a void and illegal appraisement. You did not designate, nor did the examiner and appraiser; examine, at least one out of 10 packages as provided for in section 499.
These protests are before us on rehearing, having been decided adversely to the importer’s contention in a decision reported in 6 Cust. Ct. 75, C. D. 430. When the case was originally before the court no testimony was offered in support of the claims made in the pleadings and the court ruled…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carey v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
- Montgomery Ward v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
- New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
- Union Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.