Legal Opinion
Bergeron v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided June 4, 1962No. 45936PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANDERS, Justice.
While performing her duties as ■ a wah> ress in a cafe, Mrs. Verna Whittaker Bergeron fell and suffered a miscarriage, or abortion. Her pregnancy was of approximately six weeks’ duration at-the time of the accident. She was disabled from February 21, 1960, to April 3, I960, at which time she resumed her regular duties. No residual injury remained.1
*111Mrs. Bergeron and her husband instituted this suit in tort for damages and in the alternative in workmen’s compensation against New Amsterdam Casualty Company, the workmen’s compensation and liability insurer of her employer. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Boyer v. Crescent Paper Box Factory, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- Colorado v. Johnson Iron Works, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- Mack v. LegeaiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- Day v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ancor v. Belden Concrete Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
- Schmolke v. Krauss CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Jack v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Perez v. Continental Cas. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
- Williams v. United States Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.