Legal Opinion

Chapman v. State Ex Rel. Mothersead

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 24, 1928No. 17934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This action at law was filed by the state on relation of the acting Bank Commissioner to recover from W. L. Chapman a liability based on the ownership of capital stock of the par value of $1,000 of the failed First State Bank of Orr.

The defendant below defended under the allegation that he had sold and transferred his stock, and had not been the owner of any stock in that bank for more than one year prior to the failure. The judgment was that Chapman was liable in the amount claimed.

_ The assignments of error may all be considered under the one query as .to whether there was any competent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wiggins v. BurkhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. State v. WareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. State ex rel. Budge v. SnyderWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Boon v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  5. Green & Sons v. Lineville Drug Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hood v. M. F. A. Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. Hoelscher v. Sel-Mor Garment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Hood v. M. F. A. Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API