Legal Opinion

Boon v. State Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 11, 1887PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Anoka county, Lochren, J., presiding, refusing a new trial, after a verdict for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

This action was brought to recover on a policy of fire insurance. A copy of the policy was annexed to the complaint as a part of it. It thus appears that one of the express conditions of *427the contract was that no action should be brought for loss under the policy, “unless commenced within six months of the date of loss.” The loss is alleged in the complaint to have occurred June 15, 1885, and such, too, was the evidence. This action was commenced December 31, 1885, more than six months after the loss. ' Nothing was alleged in the complaint to avoid the effect of the contract, as to the time of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wiggins v. BurkhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Trainor v. WormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Finn v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Hand v. National Live-Stock Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  3. Atchison Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  4. Chapman v. State Ex Rel. MotherseadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Stebbins v. Friend, Crosby & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API