State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. McAnally
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA
Plaintiff brought this action seeking a declaration that defendants were not entitled to coverage under an exclusion clause contained in a certain policy. Both sides presented motions for summary judgment, and defendant Robert McAnally also sought judgment on the pleadings. After considering the pleadings, McAnally’s deposition, memoranda, and hearing argument, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant McAnally appeals. A brief recitation of the undisputed facts follows.
Plaintiff issued an automobile policy to a Mr. Sweeney which was in force at the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Caster v. Motors Ins. Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- Grahame v. MitchellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- W.H. Sanders v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Continental National American Group v. Allied Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance v. MohanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. National Insurance Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Fuller's Car Wash, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Van Vleck v. BarbeeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Transamerica Insurance Group v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1980
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. West American InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.